Sunday, 23 September 2012

Social and Moral Order


This week my blog post on social and moral order is a response to Ashley.

This is the link to her post.


Weider detected a code which was operative at a halfway house. This code was a set of activities that they should and should not engage in, showing loyalty to the other residents and avoiding spending time with the staff. Part of the code states that a resident must not trust staff. This is mentioned in Ashley’s post. Ashley works at a youth refuge in the Illawarra and sometimes feels uncomfortable confronting residents. This is probably because the residents display a strong sense of loyalty to one another and it may be intimidating to a staff member who is on the “outside”.  

I stumbled across another article by Einat and Einat (2000) that touches on the inmate subculture in Israeli prisons. The behavioural and moral code may be seen as a collective and functional stand for coping with the prison environment. It alleviates the suffering caused by deprivation, inhospitable conditions, social heterogeneity of peers, confusion between two worlds, lack of stability, relative inactivity, boredom, and an unclear future. Punishments for breaching the code are severe and strong negative sanctions are applied in the form of verbal and physical violence, social isolation, withholding food, and withdrawal of commodities such as cigarettes and drugs.

“A prisoner who becomes a snitch will be ambushed, knifed, his face will be cut… So everybody will know who he is, and that they should never act like him.”

Another example of this inmate code is seen in the film The Longest Yard, where a group of inmates forms a gridiron team to play against a well-drilled team of prison guards. Throughout the film the inmates are determined to show the guards who is boss on the sporting field.
   
I totally agree with Ashley, there is an element of apprehension when dealing with criminals, big or small! Even when you have the “authority”. 

References

Einat, T & Einat, H 2000, ‘Inmate argot as an expression of prison subculture: The Israeli case’, The Prison Journal, vol.80, no.3, pp309-325.

Weider, DL 1974, ‘Telling the code’, in R Turner (ed.), Ethnomethodology: Selected Readings, Penguin Education, Harmondsworth, pp144-172.

No comments:

Post a Comment